Books: Patrick Suskind’s “Perfume” & Its Impact on Actual Perfume Creation

One of my favorite books that I’ve read in the last decade is the international best-seller, Perfume: The Story of a Murderer, by Patrick Suskind. Also known as Das Perfum or Le Parfum, the 1985 German novel is also one of the most beautifully written books I’ve read, a lyrical ode that explores the sense of smell in the most evocative, powerful way imaginable. As any perfume blogger can tell you, aroma is not an easy thing to convey. And, yet, Suskind manages brilliantly, re-creating the world of 18th-century France in all its horrors and fetid stink.

Suskind PerfumeThe book crosses and mixes several literary genres, from gothic to horror and the supernatural in the vein of Edgar Allen Poe. I find it difficult to adequately summarize the book (and we all know that brevity isn’t my forte!), so I’ll rely on Google books for a description that doesn’t give too much away:

An acclaimed bestseller and international sensation, Patrick Suskind’s classic novel provokes a terrifying examination of what happens when one man’s indulgence in his greatest passion—his sense of smell—leads to murder.

In the slums of eighteenth-century France, the infant Jean-Baptiste Grenouille is born with one sublime gift-an absolute sense of smell. As a boy, he lives to decipher the odors of Paris, and apprentices himself to a prominent perfumer who teaches him the ancient art of mixing precious oils and herbs. But Grenouille’s genius is such that he is not satisfied to stop there, and he becomes obsessed with capturing the smells of objects such as brass doorknobs and frest-cut wood. Then one day he catches a hint of a scent that will drive him on an ever-more-terrifying quest to create the “ultimate perfume”—the scent of a beautiful young virgin. Told with dazzling narrative brillance, Perfume is a hauntingly powerful tale of murder and sensual depravity.

It has garnered huge international praise from many, while others find it creepy, perfume bookdisturbing and truly revolting. Most of my friends who’ve read the book, even those who aren’t into perfume, adored it. In contrast, the good Christian, conservative, elderly Texan ladies in my book club were horrified by it. Horrified! Aghast! (I blame that mostly on the ending which I won’t discuss lest I spoil it for you.)

Amazon has an excerpt of the book’s opening paragraphs which illustrate the exquisite writing (as translated from Suskind’s original German) and his ability to evoke powerful imagery in such a way that you are transported back to Paris in the mid-1700s:

In eighteenth-century France there lived a man who was one of the most gifted and abominable personages in an era that knew no lack of gifted and abominable personages. His story will be told here. His name was Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, and if his name-in contrast to the names of other gifted abominations, de Sade’s, for instance, or Saint-Just’s, Fouché’s, Bonaparte’s, etc.-has been forgotten today, it is certainly not because Grenouille fell short of those more famous blackguards when it came to arrogance, misanthropy, immorality, or, more succinctly, to wickedness, but because his gifts and his sole ambition were restricted to a domain that leaves no traces in history: to the fleeting realm of scent.

Scene from the movie, "Perfume." Source:

Scene from the movie, “Perfume.” Source:

In the period of which we speak, there reigned in the cities a stench barely conceivable to us modern men and women. The streets stank of manure, the courtyards of urine, the stairwells stank of moldering wood and rat droppings, the kitchens of spoiled cabbage and mutton fat; the unaired parlors stank of stale dust, the bedrooms of greasy sheets, damp featherbeds, and the pungently sweet aroma of chamber pots. The stench of sulfur rose from the chimneys, the stench of caustic lyes from the tanneries, and from the slaughterhouses came the stench of congealed blood. People stank of sweat and unwashed clothes; from their mouths came the stench of rotting teeth, from their bellies that of onions, and from their bodies, if they were no longer very young, came the stench of rancid cheese and sour milk and tumorous disease. The rivers stank, the marketplaces stank, the churches stank, it stank beneath the bridges and in the palaces. The peasant stank as did the priest, the apprentice as did his master’s wife, the whole of the aristocracy stank, even the king himself stank, stank like a rank lion, and the queen like an old goat, summer and winter. For in the eighteenth century there was nothing to hinder bacteria busy at decomposition, and so there was no human activity, either constructive or destructive, no manifestation of germinating or decaying life that was not accompanied by stench.

And of course the stench was foulest in Paris, for Paris was the largest city of France. And in turn there was a spot in Paris under the sway of a particularly fiendish stench: between the rue aux Fers and the rue de la Ferronnerie, the Cimetiere des Innocents to be exact. For eight hundred years the dead had been brought here from the Hotel-Dieu and from the surrounding parish churches, for eight hundred years, day in, day out, corpses by the dozens had been carted here and tossed into long ditches, stacked bone upon bone for eight hundred years in the tombs and charnel houses. Only later-on the eve of the Revolution, after several of the grave pits had caved in and the stench had driven the swollen graveyard’s neighbors to more than mere protest and to actual insurrection-was it finally closed and abandoned. Millions of bones and skulls were shoveled into the catacombs of Montmartre and in its place a food market was erected.

Here, then, on the most putrid spot in the whole kingdom, Jean-Baptiste Grenouille was born on July 17, 1738. It was one of the hottest days of the year. The heat lay leaden upon the graveyard, squeezing its putrefying vapor, a blend of rotting melon and the fetid odor of burnt animal horn, out into the nearby alleys. When the labor pains began, Grenouille’s mother was standing at a fish stall in the rue aux Fers, scaling whiting that she had just gutted. The fish, ostensibly taken that very morning from the Seine, already stank so vilely that the smell masked the odor of corpses. Grenouille’s mother, however, perceived the odor neither of the fish nor of the corpses, for her sense of smell had been utterly dulled, besides which her belly hurt, and the pain deadened all susceptibility to sensate impressions. She only wanted the pain to stop, she wanted to put this revolting birth behind her as quickly as possible. It was her fifth. She had effected all the others here at the fish booth, and all had been stillbirths or semi-stillbirths, for the bloody meat that emerged had not differed greatly from the fish guts that lay there already, nor had lived much longer, and by evening the whole mess had been shoveled away and carted off to the graveyard or down to the river. It would be much the same this day, and Grenouille’s mother, who was still a young woman, barely in her mid-twenties, and who still was quite pretty and had almost all her teeth in her mouth and some hair on her head and – except for gout and syphilis and a touch of consumption – suffered from no serious disease, who still hoped to live a while yet, perhaps a good five or ten years, and perhaps even to marry one day and as the honorable wife of a widower with a trade or some such to bear real children . . . Grenouille’s mother wished that it were already over. And when the final contractions began, she squatted down under the gutting table and there gave birth, as she had done four times before, and cut the newborn thing’s umbilical cord with her butcher knife. But then, on account of the heat and the stench, which she did not perceive as such but only as an unbearable, numbing something-like a field of lilies or a small room filled with too many daffodils-she grew faint, toppled to one side, fell out from under the table into the street, and lay there, knife in hand.

Born in blood to a woman who tried to murder him, and then later rejected by society, Grenouille’s life was not an easy one. It was rendered even more difficult by the fact that he had a supernatural sense of smell but no personal scent of his own. The latter made people shy away from him, finding him something unnatural and unnerving. From an orphanage to a poor house, to a brutal apprenticeship as a tanner’s assistant and more, Grenouille — the book’s hero, anti-hero or monster, depending on your view — led a life of constant hardship, isolation and social rejection.

There was no joy in his world except his ability to detect the very olfactory essence of every object around him: from rocks to brass knobs, from the smell of the water to the very essence of the wind. Yet, even that supernatural ability never gave him much purpose in life until, one day, he stumbled upon a red-haired virgin. And it changed everything. He fell in love with her aroma — the scent of pure love and infinite beauty — and was determined to replicate it in a bottle at any cost. Including murder. As the back of my copy of Perfume states:

It was after that first crime that he knew he was a genius – that he understood his destiny. He, Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, the fishmonger’s bastard, was to be the greatest perfumer of all time. For he possessed the power not just to create beautiful scents, but to distil the very essence of love itself.

And as the obsession began, so would it end….

His ensuing path, and the trail of bodies he left in his wake, is one you must discover for yourself, as I shan’t give away the tale.

Christophe LaudamielSource: NYT SmellBound

Christophe Laudamiel
Source: NYT SmellBound

It is hardly surprising that Perfume had an enormous impact on actual “noses” and perfumers in the industry. Take, for example, the obsession of Christophe Laudamiel. As Chandler Burr explains in a New York Times article entitled “Smellbound,” Laudamiel was transfixed by the book from the moment he read it in perfumery school. When he began work for the giant fragrance corporation I.F.F. (International Flavors and Fragrances) in 2000, he set out to systematically recreate the pivotal scenes of this murderer’s story in scents, one by one:

Laudamiel would work on the novel’s scents alone, on his own time, evenings, weekends. No one knew he was doing it. He spent nights in the lab, mixing and remixing to find, say, the exact smell of freshly tanned leather, and would go home at 6 a.m. The first scent he created was Ermite (Hermit), the smell of the cave: damp stone, moss, pine, mountain wind, cold. He created Amour and Psyche, the best-selling perfume that Grenouille copies perfectly from scratch in the novel. Strangest of all, however, was Virgin No. 1, the scent of the girl who sold those yellow plums in the Paris streets. Years ago, an I.F.F. scientist recruited two young female virgins and, with their parents’ permission, recorded their aroma using a polymer needle. Laudamiel found this scent on I.F.F.’s shelves, then added christophe_laudamiel_2the scents Süskind describes as clinging to the virgin’s skin: apricot, nuts, sea breeze.

[There was also] Human Existence. It was the scent the scentless Grenouille creates for himself. “You must remember,” Laudamiel says, “this character’s being born without a scent has made him terribly lonely, lost, ignored. Having his own scent makes him whole. It makes him human.” [Emphasis added.]

Perfume PosterThat was just the start. In 2006, the movie version of Perfume came out, with small roles for Alan Rickman and Dustin Hoffmann. (It’s not a particularly good film. Really, it’s not! And I say that as someone who adores Alan Rickman. So, even though the film is easily available via NetFlix, read the book instead!) Perfume_Poster1_9407

Laudamiel met with the film’s German producer, Thomas Friedl, and with Vera Strubi, the head of Thierry Mugler perfumes. Laudamiel presented them with some of his Grenouille scents, and

[t]hey were mesmerized. They found themselves experiencing the book, its details and its characters. Strubi loved Laudamiel’s smells, the good as well as the bad.

It was agreed that Mugler would perfect 14 scents and package them in a special coffret — Paris 1738, Atelier Grimal and Orgie among them. But Strubi also wanted him to create a 15th scent for Thierry Mugler, a perfume that captured the essence of Süskind’s book. The obvious choice would be to try to create the perfume Grenouille makes from the scent of the murdered virgins. But that was impossible (by definition it didn’t exist), and not to mention, Strubi said, too pretentious.

Mugler Coffret set for "Perfume". Source: Fragrantica

Mugler Coffret set for “Perfume”. Source: Fragrantica

In 2006, the perfume blog, The Scented Salamander, posted a description of the final result, along with some of the Mugler press release:

In this boxed set of 15 fragrances, Thierry Mugler dares to present the novel’s 15 olfactory themes. ‘Disturbing, arousing, divine, sensual, icy… none of the fifteen compositions will leave you indifferent’…

The boxed set contains fourteen olfactory compositions bearing the names Baby, Paris 1738, Atelier Grimal, Virgin Number One, Boutique Baldini, Amor & Psyche, Nuit Napolitaine, Ermite, Salon Rouge, Human Existence, Absolu Jasmin, Sea, Noblesse, Orgie. Uncompromising fragrances evoking human warmth, love, sexuality, wealth, virginity and more… The fifteenth fragrance, ‘Aura’ is a creative interpretation of the bewitching magic spell cast by the ‘virtuoso, terrifying scent of Grenouille’, the murderous hero of Perfume. 84 ingredients compose its top-secret formula, by fragrance designers Christophe Laudamiel and Christophe Hornetz.

She later posted some preliminary impressions of the 15 perfumes. In a nutshell, she found the scents “strangely beautiful” for the most part, though I personally thought she seemed less than enchanted by “Virgin #1.”

Victoria of Bois de Jasmin posted a comprehensive review of the Mugler/Laudamiel scents. She has fabulous descriptions of each perfume, so I encourage you to read her review in full, but here is her assessment of the critical Virgin #1 scent:

No. 1 Part I, Chapter 8 of “Perfume: The Story of A Murderer”

“A girl was sitting at the table cleaning yellow plums… A hundred thousand odors seemed worthless in the presence of this scent. It was pure beauty.”

In one of the interviews with Laudamiel, I read that the IFF team worked to capture the scent of a young girl’s navel via headspace (a technology designed for capturing and analyzing the aroma molecules in the air around the source of scent.) This novel accord was used in Virgin No. 1. While I was intrigued by the idea, nothing prepared me for the sheer beauty of the fragrance. The base of the composition is the most exquisite musky accord, milky like fresh cream, smooth like peach skin and warm like delicate cashmere. An intoxicatingly luscious plum is woven though the musky tapestry, lightening it and lending it an irresistibly playful facet. Although it is amazing on the blotter, on the skin, the fragrance reveals all of its beautiful facets in a panoramic manner. It is innocent, and yet it possesses a beguiling and sensual edge. It is subtle, yet its sillage is magnificent. It is breathtakingly beautiful.

On Fragrantica, those who have smelled Virgin #1 seem to have found it equally stunning. But, alas, we shall have to live vicariously through their experiences, since the perfumes are now akin to the Holy Grail and a unicorn, combined into one.

It’s not merely the obvious fact that they are no longer available; it seems they were always elusive. I read on Fragrantica that only 300 coffrets were produced, that they sold out in Europe in a week, and, at the time, cost $600 each. According to another poster on the site, one of those sets was valued at over $1,000 as of December 2011 when it was offered for sale. I’ve never seen a single one on eBay, though I’ve heard they do appear from time to time.

The point of all this is not to create an exercise in frustration — though, clearly, it may do that as well. The point is to demonstrate the incredible power of Suskind’s olfactory imagery and the extent to which his book can compel an obsession all of its own. It’s also intended to demonstrate the extent to which the book has influenced actual perfumers in the industry and how they have attempted to turn that most abstract of things — the literary image of something as evanescent as scent — into something concrete. In fact, I would bet anything that Etat Libre d’Orange’s infamous Sécrétions Magnifiques was influenced, at least in some part, by Suskind’s book. And, lastly, it shows just how far perfumery has come in modern times: harnessing the scent molecules of virgins. (With no actual bloodshed involved!)

If you are a perfumista and haven’t read Suskind’s brilliant book, I strongly urge you to do so. It will blow your mind! Even if you’re not particularly into perfume, you may still want to pick it up. Whether you find it brilliant or creepily disturbing beyond words, I can guarantee you one thing: it’s like nothing else you will ever read.

On Amazon US, “Perfume” currently costs $8.15. On Amazon Canada, it costs CDN $12.27. On Amazon UK, it costs £6.29. On Amazon France, “Le Parfum” costs EUR 5,32. It should be available on all the other Amazon sites as well, in addition to your local bookstores. 

20 thoughts on “Books: Patrick Suskind’s “Perfume” & Its Impact on Actual Perfume Creation

  1. Amazing translation and a riveting read. Certainly learnt a lot from reading this. Intensely disliked the plot turn in the last quarter of the book. What not have a beautiful ending?

    • A lot of people have raised the same question. I think that — symbolically — there was no other choice. Both for the plot and for Grenouille himself. He felt utterly and completely empty after the notorious crowd scene which was — in and of itself — a natural progression for the plot after he made the perfume. What else was left for him afterwards? More purple palaces of the mind, the way he had in the cave? I think the only way for him to feel whole was if he was in everyone, every piece of him. He had been consumed by his obsession so the next thing was for him to be…. In an odd way, it was the only way he could feel a part of the society that had rejected him and to be loved as *part* of people, instead of this supernatural power that was either shunted to the side or totally above them and omnipotent. At least, that’s how I read it. 🙂

      I’m so thrilled that you too found the book to be a riveting read!! It can certainly transform the way one approaches scent, doesn’t it? And it stays with one in even small ways. I have a friend who interpreted YSL’s M7 as: “M7 is basically Grenouille’s final scent where people don’t know why they are descending into a giant orgy!” Heh. And, more than once, I’ve found myself wondering how scents now compare to Baldini’s creations.

  2. I also loved the movie, Lucas. It was a huge, huge failure in the U.S., and I don’t know a single U.S.-based person who saw it except me, the people I forced to watch it with me, and Kafka. LOL. It was funny – I saw the movie at home in Los Angeles with people who very clearly had not read the book, and when it got to the end and the lights turned on, everyone’s mouth was basically agape with people wondering what the hell they had just seen! I laugh every time I think about it!

    Granted, the movie is not (and never could be) as good as the book, but it was basically the best and most faithful adaptation I could have envisioned given the limitation of translating such a rich book into cinema, which is a challenge in any circumstance, but especially when the dominant theme of the book is not about something that cannot really be conveyed visually. My main criticism of the movie was that Dustin Hoffman was simply not the right fit for Baldini (he played it very campy, with lots of scenery-chewing and I think it was the wrong choice given the tone of the book/movie). But the book is absolutely *amazing* and possibly my favorite piece of modern fiction. And I read it before I was interested in perfume at all! I highly recommend trying the book, it’s weird, it’s creepy, it’s magical, and it’s beautifully written (or at least the English translation is beautiful, I’m sure it’s even more amazing in German, though my German skills aren’t at the level where I could read the book yet!) It’s one of the few books I’ve ever bothered to read more than once.

    The ending is sort of bizarre, but I loved it and thought it was so perfect for the character and the novel as a whole. While I don’t (and will never!) have a nose like Grenouille’s, the book has made me more aware of quite literally stopping to smell the roses, or at least not to take for granted those seemingly simple everyday smells we come across daily – the good and the bad.

    Sigh, what I wouldn’t give to have the opportunity to smell the box of 15 by Mugler. I thought so much when I read the book about what each must have smelled like, and it would be fun to see someone else’s take on it. Maybe someday I’ll be rich and find one on eBay! We could have a smelling party! LOL.

  3. Not reading the comments not reading the comments spoiler alert spoiler alert! This sounds like a creepy must read and right up my alley. I’ll check the library first but if the only copy available is dog-eared, I will buy it the next time I have a B&N coupon. I bought Aphrodesia with the most recent coupon.

    • Hajusuuri, I think people have been EXTREMELY good about being careful in the comments section and have avoided any really clear giveaways about the plot. (That said, you may want to skip my very first reply (to Jordan River).) Much of the discussion there focuses on the Movie -vs- The Book. But I’m so glad you’re going to pick up the book! Why not get a library copy and, then, if you love it, you can buy it on Amazon for around $8?! It’s worth every penny!

  4. Suskind’s book was one of the several books in my life that changed something in how I view the world. I read and loved it… almost 25 years ago. I decided not to watch the movie-just because I believe that almost never a movie can be as great as a great book (there were some exceptions but I didn’t want to check it in this case). But I was extremely interested in those perfumes… but decided not to pursue them: I couldn’t buy a set (it wasn’t offered anywhere) and I didn’t want just to get samples -though I saw those for sale.

    • “Perfume” is definitely one of those books that can alter how we perceive the world around us! I am so glad you are another fan of it, Undina. 🙂 And you’re right about how movies can be far less powerful (or successful) than the underlying book. I think if Suskind’s book is really, really dear and significant to one’s heart, it would probably be better to keep it safe and untarnished by the limitations of film!

      Mugler had samples of his line??! Wow. I’m not sure I would have been able to resist those!

      • No, not official samples. If I’m not mistaken, The Perfumed Court used to have a set of 0.5 or 1 ml dab samples for the line – but it was long time ago and now it’s gone.

  5. I forgot to mention, the book has a quote that I wrote down and saved, because it applies to so many things in life and it always makes me smile: “Thronging the bridge and the quays along both banks of the river, a crowd of many thousands accompanied the spectacle with aahs and oohs and bravos, even some ‘long lives’ – although the King had ascended his throne more than thirty-eight years before and the high point of his popularity was long since behind him. Fireworks can do that.” It says so much about how easily distracted we often are from issues of substance.

    • It’s a lovely quote, Kevin. And the sardonic, dry “Fireworks can do that” definitely accentuates his and your point. I don’t remember any one particular line from the book; instead, I remember a plethora of visual imagery, from purple castles to the fishmonger’s stall. Endless images, each one as vivid as the day I first read them. The man is so unbelievably talented and, imo, as great — if not greater — than any Dickens, Faulkner, Hemingway or other famous writer. I think only Victor Hugo can really compare to his literary brilliance and powerful imagery. I wish Suskind had more recognition.

  6. So as luck would have it, my library has the book BUT, get this, in Chinese! My local Barnes & Noble has it (at least according to the Pick Me Up service and yay, I have 20% off coupon so I am getting the book for less than $7 including tax.

    • Your library only has Suskind in Chinese???!?! ROFL! That’s so…. perplexingly odd. I’m so glad you ordered it, Hajusuuri. And what a great price too! I can’t wait to see what you think of it.

    • The book is spectacular! Utterly amazing. For me, the movie wasn’t bad, but almost NO movie adaptations of any kind can ever be as good as the original book, and this movie was no exception. Personally, I think the book is so fantastic that the movie could have been much better and was a bit of a disappointment. But at least they TRIED to make a movie out of Parfum! It cannot have been an easy task, as it’s such a complicated, tricky book. I just wish someone would try again.

  7. So of course since I love your blog I’m making my way through older posts and just saw this one–would you believe it was the movie that inspired my current obsession with perfumery? Sounds silly, especially as I agree with you that it’s not a particularly good film, but there you have it. I was just fascinated by the portrayal of old-school perfume making, and being someone with a really strong sense of smell (a handicap in NYC, let me tell ya), the whole thing just spoke to me, and made me really curious as to how perfumery works. I haven’t yet the read the book, but from the excerpts above I know I’m in for a treat.

    • Not silly at all, my dear, but, actually, completely understandable!! Perfume is a fascinating, riveting movie, if you haven’t read the book, but still interesting even if you have. I urge you — nay, beg you — to read the book as soon as you have time. The way that something as abstract as a smell is conveyed… My GOD, it’s truly brilliant. Really, a work of genius, in my opinion. And the writing is extremely elegant as a whole. I can’t wait to see what you think of it! 🙂

  8. Pingback: Grab Bag Round-Up - May 2015 - Kafkaesque

  9. Pingback: St. Clair Scents - Part I: The Queen of Butter & The Intersection of Artisanal Food & Artisanal Perfume - Kafkaesque

Comments are closed.