Etro Rajasthan

The massive Indian state of Rajasthan is one of the most beautiful places I’ve ever seen, in a country that I loved as a whole. From Jodhpur, Jaipur, Udaipur, and several points in between, I traveled in stunned awe, marveling at the splendour of princely palaces but also at the state’s natural beauty. There were other places in India that stole my heart more but, for sheer impressiveness, the ancient cities of Rajasthan are hard to beat.

Source: Fragrantica

Source: Fragrantica

Yet, my feelings about Rajasthan were actually not why I was so desperate to try the perfume by the same name from the Italian fashion house of Etro. No, in this case, it was purely a superficial issue of bottle beauty. I’m really not one to be swayed by perfume packaging, but Etro‘s Rajasthan was a distinct exception to the rule. From the moment I saw the bottle, I loved it. Back when I would post about upcoming releases, the only one which ever tempted me solely because of the packaging was Rajasthan. Later, when reviews came out, I lost my enthusiasm, as the character of the fragrance didn’t seem to match the splendour of that vivid packaging. Still, when I passed by an Etro boutique in Paris, I made sure to give Rajasthan a sniff and to get a sample. Alas, the bottle really is fundamentally better than the scent. By a landslide….



On its website, Etro describes Rajasthan and its notes as follows:

Rajasthan tells the tale of the constant traveler moving into colourful Maharajaha cities in the East, as each sensual scent reveals the inherent femininity, passion and elegance of the nomadic soul.

Poetry and seduction intertwine in an impatient prophecy and longing for eastern summers: even the brightly coloured, enamel bottle leaves just a trace of the sinuous Paisley just like the imprint of influence within nomadic life. A fragrance that holds hope for tomorrow, creating the perfect balance between cosmopolitan accents and the timeless grace of a shining India.

Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Source: -

Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Source: –

Pink pepper, Lemon Primo fiore, Polygonum
Cassie, Mimosa, Rose
Amber, Musk, Ciste [labdanum amber]



The first hour of Rajasthan is simply dreadful on my skin. The perfume opens with lemon florals infused with painfully sharp, clean white musk. The flowers feel sweet, almost honeyed and like a distant relation to linden blossoms. A pale, pink rose lurks behind them, along with the fruited notes of pink pepper berries and a tiny dusting of mimosa (also known as cassie). None of it smells remotely like anything to do with India. It doesn’t even smell like a Westerner’s fantasy of India. Instead, it is like a pale English floral, a walk in some European orchid in bloom, or a visit to the aisles of Sephora circa 2005.

Pink peppercorns. Source:

Pink peppercorns. Source:

One reason for that last remark is the pink pepper berries.They were a huge cornerstone of commercial perfumery during the 2000s, and they gooped-up numerous florals with their syrupy, fruitchouli-like tonalities. If you’ve tried Marc JacobsLola, Estée Lauder‘s Pleasures, or any number of fragrances that followed in their path, you will be familiar with the note. It’s much more infrequent today, at least in niche or expensive perfumes, and I’ve been grateful for that fact, so seeing them here is a huge disappointment.

"Cottage Garden Rose-Petal Syrup." Photo: BecR on

“Cottage Garden Rose-Petal Syrup.” Photo: BecR on

The gooey berries quickly become a key part of Rajasthan, along with the rose. Within 10 minutes, the lemony florals retreat to the background, the nebulous suggestion of mimosa vanishes entirely, and I’m left primarily with girly pink roses drenched in pink pepper molasses. The concoction is also infused with the smallest touch of lemon, and a ton of fresh, white musk that is increasingly becoming similar to laundry drier sheets. The overall result is a scent that actually smells like a flanker to Lola. A paler, fresher, lighter Lola, but most definitely a relation nonetheless.

Lola, Velvet Edition bottle. Source:

Lola, Velvet Edition bottle. Source:

It’s all terribly clean in the first hour, in addition to being fresh and girly. There wouldn’t be anything wrong with the latter if the overall scent didn’t smell so similar to a mainstream designer fragrance for $60 in Sephora. (Actually, you can find Lola for about $48 at Target.) Given that Rajasthan costs $190, more than three times as much, smelling like a lighter, cleaner version of Lola is wholly unacceptable for the price. It all feels very gauzy, translucent, and wispy, but with the sort of strength that is typical of fragrances which amp up the clean white musk to give their diaphanous bouquet the impression of strength. At no point does any of it smell luxurious, high-end, distinctive, or original, but especially not in this first, very unappealing hour.

Thankfully, Rajasthan ends up improving, by quite a bit, in fact. It’s still not my personal cup of tea, but the body of the scent leaves behind the first hour’s mix of roses infused with hideously sharp, piercing, drier sheet musk, pink pepper berry goop, and a trace of lemon. Roughly 75 minutes, the first hint of hope appears in the form of an abstract, golden warmth. It doesn’t feel at all like real amber, and it is most certainly not either labdanum or ambergris but a synthetic benzoin. That is a type of resin which is used by perfumers to add a golden base to fragrances. Very frequently, it smells like vanilla powder or cinnamon-dusted vanilla — and both those things occur in Rajasthan as well.



Soon, Rajasthan begins to change. At the 90-minute mark, the lemons evaporate completely, the vanilla benzoin becomes more pronounced, and Rajasthan takes on a sweet powderiness that sometimes evokes images of pollen. The latter doesn’t smell like the mimosa blossoms of my youth but, rather, more like an abstract recreation of the flower, if that makes any sense. The musk loses some of its laundry drier tonalities and becomes much less aggressively clean, sharp, and fresh. The overall, sum-total effect makes me think of peony roses covered with slightly vanillic powder. It’s actually quite pretty, perhaps because of that subtle undercurrent of edible treats.

Source: (Website link embedded within.)

Source: (Website link embedded within.)

At the start of the 3rd hour, Rajasthan turns fully golden as the benzoin surges to the forefront. The fragrance is now a mix of “amber” infused with abstract peony roses, powdery sweetness, a lighter veil of clean musk, and a dollop of red, fruity jam. It’s not hugely floral, but almost gourmand in nature. That impression becomes stronger as the perfume turns heavily vanillic in nature. By the time the 4th hour rolls around, Rajasthan reminds me of a cinnamon-vanilla cookie, drizzled with jam, and subtly laced with almost an almond-like note. There is still a lingering sense of something floral, but it is very muffled, minor, and abstract. The clean musk remains, alas, and is quite noticeable when you smell Rajasthan up close.

From afar, though, the perfume is really more about powdery, sweet, vanilla benzoin in a golden, warm cocoon with a dash of jam. It’s enjoyable, a far cry from the ghastly opening hour, and feels like something intended to be an easy, approachable, commercial crowd-pleaser. However, the vanilla cookies only last 2.5 to 3 hours, and is essentially just Rajasthan’s middle phase. The final drydown is much less cozy and appealing. In a nutshell, the fragrance loses much of its golden warmth, as the clean musk returns to center stage at the start of the 6th hour and overtakes the vanilla.



The end result is a simple scent: powdery cleanness with a vague golden softness about it and an increasingly minor hint of vanilla. At times, the impression of pollen returns, but the note here is really more due to the benzoin than anything to do with cassie or acacia mimosas. In its final moments, Rajasthan is merely a wispy blur of clean, sweet powder. All in all, the fragrance lasted just over 7.5 hours on me with 3 smears amounting to 2 small spritzes from a bottle. The sillage was initially moderate, and the fragrance became a skin scent at the start of the 4th hour.

The reaction to Rajasthan has been mixed. On Fragrantica, people seem to really like the scent, and talk about its sweet, powdery nature, mixed with vanilla, florals, lemon, and subtle spice. They find it cozy, or “as soft as a baby’s skin or a cashmere scarf.” Bloggers are less enthused, however, and it is not because of the failed promise of India, either.

"Powder Palace" painting, ARTbyKristen on Etsy. (Website link to her Etsy shop embedded within.)

“Powder Palace” painting, ARTbyKristen on Etsy. (Website link to her Etsy shop embedded within.)

Take, for example, Kevin at Now Smell This whose fantasies about the smells of India were dashed by a mere look at the fragrance’s notes, but whose main issue was the scent itself. His review read, in part, as follows:

My first intimation Rajasthan might be more “business as usual” than “trip in a bottle” was its listed fragrance note  [… which] could just as easily represent the south of France, California…or the Bland Lands of Sephora. […]

Rajasthan goes on smelling rather indistinct: a mélange of soft, powdery aromas (with a hint of “freshness”). I detect a pallid floral accord, maybe a dash of pepper, and some opaque citrus. There is also a Rose in Distress, the note being choked by a sweet, crumbly musk and a talcy, “white” violet-like scent. I do smell mimosa/cassie; they are “hazy” and dry. I know Rajasthan, the place, is mostly desert, but all this scented “dust” in Rajasthan doesn’t thrill me. Where’s the dissonance, some “racket,” techni-colors, floral syrup,dirt? As Rajasthan dries on skin, a vanillic note appears and, mercifully, for a short while, is joined by a hint of “tartness” (smelling like a “rhubarb pastille”). Finally, Rajasthan becomes white musk, pure and simple.



Rajasthan is advertised as “unisex”, but I bet it’s too feminine for most men (myself included). Due to all the powder, talc, and dusty/hazy elements, Rajasthan has the character of a cosmetic perfume, something a manufacturer of face powders would use to scent their product. […] Resist the urge to buy Rajasthan unsniffed, even if you want the bottle (as I do)! And speaking of the bottle — talk about false advertising! To represent this perfume, Etro should have used a subdued palette of pale pinks, ivory and butter-colored yellow, not the “hot” colors they decided upon.



Bois de Jasmin had a very similar, equally disappointed take on Rajasthan:

It takes me a few moments to realize that Rajasthan doesn’t transport me further than the local beauty counter. It smells uncannily like a rose and violet scented lipstick, but admittedly, it’s a pleasant scent. Its rich composition is based on rose and amber with a jammy accent of violets and gardenia. The rose is creamy and warm, while the marshmallow sweetness of orange blossom gives it a gourmand finish. As the perfume unfolds on your skin, it becomes soft and powdery, with fluffy vanilla rounding out all edges. It has a big presence, noticeable sillage, and a retro chic character.

If you enjoy perfumes that smell of vintage lipstick and face powder, Rajasthan will win you over. But before you splurge on it, I recommend looking for Rochas Tocade. The two fragrances share many similar nuances and effects in common. […][¶] Rajasthan doesn’t improve on it, but it certainly smells very good. Still, I can’t justify its high price when we still have the marvelous Tocade available for far less. (Or another great rose-vanilla like Lancôme Trésor.) The only thing in Rajasthan’s favor over Tocade is a stylish enameled flacon decorated with the signature Etro paisley pattern. But we don’t wear the bottle, do we?

Alas, no, we do not wear the bottle, that marvelous, marvelous bottle.

Udaipur Market in Rajasthan. Photo: Amos Rojter or "Brother Amos." Source:

Udaipur Market in Rajasthan. Photo: Amos Rojter or “Brother Amos.” Source:

I want to be very clear about something: my feelings about Rajasthan, the perfume, have nothing to do with my time in India or my love for the country. The problem is not disappointment over Etro’s inability to bottle the smell or even the feel of that brilliantly vibrant, bold, Technicolor land. Had Rajasthan been a good fragrance with little connection to India, I would have been happy. Instead, it’s merely an okay scent with a terrible start, an enjoyable but not long-lasting middle, and an uninteresting, insipid end. The ingredients are synthetic and not luxurious; the overall bouquet is pale, bland, generic, derivative, and unremarkable; and the whole thing is ridiculously over-priced.

Rajasthan’s olfactory profile is built around elements that are commercially popular, in beauty as well as perfume products, so I’m not surprised that women on Fragrantica find it appealing. However, that does not change the fact that charging $190 is highway robbery. Rajasthan is available for less on eBay, but, personally, I find even $99 hard to justify for such a simple, commercial scent that involved only two and half enjoyable hours. Still, if girly, jammy, fruity-roses with powdery benzoin vanilla and very clean musk are your thing, then please get samples first or look to eBay. That bright, happy bottle is simply not worth it by itself.

Cost & Availability: Rajasthan is an eau de parfum that only comes in a 100 ml bottle that costs $190, €122, or £112. The fragrance also comes with matching body products, though not every site carries it. Etro shows the perfume on its various websites, like Etro US or Etro Italy, but does not have an e-store where you can buy it directly from them. (As a side note, the US fragrance page has incredibly annoying music that you simply cannot turn off!) You can also buy the fragrance from their stores, and that is actually where I obtained my sample (from their Paris boutique in St. Germain). In the U.S.: you can buy Rajasthan from Osswald NYC, along with a sample in their Sample Program. The perfume is also sold at Barneys and Elements Beauty Shop. Saks only has the candles, not the fragrances. On eBay, the perfume is available at a discount, starting at $99, though most sellers don’t ship worldwide. Outside the U.S.: In Canada, Etiket carries Rajasthan, along with the entire Etro line. In the U.K., Harvey Nichols carries Etro perfumes. I found Rajasthan sold at a discount on Amazon UK via Prestige Europe for roughly £105. In Europe, First in Fragrance has Rajasthan at quite a discount for €102,52, along with the full line of body products. Essenza Nobile sells it for full price at €122. Germany’s Douglas also sells Rajasthan and its body products. So does the Netherland’s Douglas site. ParfuMaria in the Netherlands carries the full Etro line, and has a great Sample Program. In Italy, I found Rajasthan at Flaconi. In France, Etro fragrances are sold at Paris’ Nose boutique and at Parfumerie Soleil d’Or, along with actual Etro stores. In Romania, Rajasthan goes for above retail at Elysees Concept. In Spain, the Etro line is sold at Nadia Perfumerie and El Corte Ingles. In Sweden, Etro is sold at COW Parfymeri; in Hungary at Le Parfum, though they did not have Rajasthan. In the Middle East, Etro has shops in Dubai, Lebanon, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Etro is also located throughout Asia, Central America, and other places. You can use the Etro Store Finder on their website to find a boutique near you. Samples: several of the sites linked above sell samples. Surrender to Chance does not carry Etro. In the U.S., your best bet is Osswald NY or Barneys.

11 thoughts on “Etro Rajasthan

    • I would have been happy with a good scent of any kind, but, yes, the bottle definitely deserved something to match its vivid, bold, oriental intensity.

  1. Oh, how I would love to visit India one day!
    I once tried Rajasthan but only remember the red pepper part and that I was disappointed. My favorite from the line is Shaal Nur.
    Btw, until next week First in Fragrance offers 20% discount on Etro scents for their registered customers.

    • Great tip about the discount, Anka. Thank you! As for Rajasthan, how funny that the pink pepper berries were all you remember from the scent. Ha, I’m not surprised. 🙂 I haven’t tried Shaal Nur, but I have a sample of the Patchouli that I will be reviewing soon.

  2. It’s a beautiful ad, too. Makes me want to buy a shawl, not the perfume!

    About a week ago, I saw a fairly long thread in a FB fragrance group about how mean spirited and impolite it was to write bad reviews. Y’know, it’s the ol’ “if you can’t say something good, don’t say anything at all.”

    I totally and emphatically disagree.

    I love your rave reviews and I love ones such as this. I knew when I read “The first hour of Rajasthan is simply dreadful on my skin. . ” I was in for a treat of analysis, not some simple wave of the hand with “Hated it.” There’s a big difference.

    If a friend of mine were to go restaurant I knew was awful, I’d be doing them a favor by telling them just how much I disliked it. For the price of perfume, it’s an even bigger favor to discuss the ones that aren’t good, isn’t it?

    Well, you know I’m a fangirl. I’ve not been commenting much lately, but have been enjoying all the writing and visuals, as usual. Cheers!

    • There are some groups where politeness is much vaunted — in public. Behind the scenes, it’s a very different situation, as the Moderators use members as target practice for mockery or abuse their power at the drop of a hat. Yet, in public, it’s all about manners and not being mean-spirited. The irony is absolutely endless, given that those who preach it are usually the biggest transgressors inn private.

      For reviews, I say my honest opinion, and those who don’t like it can go read any one of a hundred blogs which only praise perfumes. My philosophy is very different than theirs, particularly given the price of the fragrances I cover. I started this blog for someone like me, who had wasted a ton of money on blind buys after reading a series of those impressionistic, generalized, gushing endorsements or reviews with little factual information and only emotional stories. My lengthy style or bluntness isn’t for everyone — only a miniscule portion of perfumistas, I would say — but I write for people like myself, and that’s it.

      All of which is to say, thank you for appreciating it and seeing a value in what I do. Your words may mean more than you know.

      • Yes indeed. I was threatened with expulsion from a group such as that for *almost* breaking some obscure group rule.

        You also write for information freaks such as me. I didn’t do a lot of blind buying.

  3. What is wrong with my nose?! (crying smiley) While I agree at least with some parts of your review (though still like the perfume), I even can imagine that the part of what I smell might be a scent of pink roses, but I don’t smell anything even remotely related to lemon. Oh well…

    But I agree: $190 is a robbery for what Rajasthan is. It has to be priced in the mass market price range.

    • LOL! It may not be your nose at all, but simply what your skin does to the notes. Perhaps your skin is bringing out the base elements, but suppressing the top ones. Perhaps you can get a few friends to sniff the Rajasthan on you, and see what they say? 🙂

  4. As soon as I read this post, my first thought was: ‘Undina….?’ It was interesting to hear her response, and to learn that the 90 minute lemons are not forthcoming on her skin.

  5. Pingback: Neela Vermeire Créations Niral - Kafkaesque

Comments are closed.