It all started as somewhat of a dream when I, sleep-deprived from insomnia, decided to order some perfume samples at 4:27 a.m. upon email notice of a Flash Sale from Surrender to Chance. I wanted some floral scents to counterbalance the blog’s heavy focus on ambers, orientals, and woody fragrances. And I actually thought I was ordering another brand entirely — April Aromatics — which just goes to show you how little sleep I sometimes get. What started as a dazed dream ended up as a bit of a nightmare.
Library of Flowers is the latest perfume house from Margot Elena, who also founded and owns Tokyo Milk and Lollia. The new brand focuses entirely on flowers, and is described as “American small batch perfumery” that has been “carefully crafted to create memorable journeys through sight and scent… [M]oments are captured in artful perfumes waiting to be released upon happy whim. The perfect pick me up to nourish the senses and inspire the gardens of the imagination.” It turns out that the line even got a small feature in the April 2013 issue of Oprah’s O Magazine. I ordered Linden and Arboretum — and one of them was absolute, unmitigated hell.
LINDEN:
Each Library of Fragrance perfume features a single top, middle and base note, and is an eau de parfum. Thus, for Linden, the notes are:
Top: Linden Blossom Middle: Narcissus Bottom: Clover Honey.
Linden blossom is sometimes called Lime Blossom, and comes from the Tillia tree. It has a sweet, bright, floral aroma that is infused with honey notes. I love honey in fragrances, so I was quite looking forward to Linden, ordering mistake notwithstanding.
Linden opens on my skin with airy, green, floral notes like magnolia and sweet honeysuckle combined, lightly sprinkled with honey and with a whisper of soapiness lurking underneath. The smell feels almost clear as a bell, except that there is an unusual fuzzy feeling around the edges. It almost feels like light, springy, fluffy, floral-infused cotton balls. The sweet coziness of the scent kept conjuring up images of those extraordinarily fluffy, plush, white, bathrobes you get at very expensive hotels, and which have a very clean, lightly soapy, floral aroma. As the moments progress, the whiff of soft cotton grows stronger underlying that billowy, airy, clear, clean, fresh, softly floral bouquet. I didn’t quite know what to make of it. True, there are faintly floral notes as well; there is a daffodil (narcissus) element that emerges briefly, but it smells more laundry-like than anything you’d smell in a field or florist shop.
Then, exactly twelve minutes later, BOOM! Chemical, synthetic notes take over, screeching out exactly like Bounce fabric softener sheets for the dryer. It feels as though I’ve cloaked my entire arm with soapy, clean, white musk and chemicals, right down to Bounce’s underlying chemical florals. It’s unbearably hideous for someone like myself who finds the words “soapy, fresh and clean” — let alone “Bounce fabric softener sheets” — to be expletives in perfumery. And, actually, expletives were abounding out of my mouth as Linden progressed unchanged (and with initially powerful projection) to remain as the very pinnacle of chemical, laundry detergent artificiality for the next seven hours. Terrible, really terrible.
Shortly before the eighth hour, Linden suddenly decides to shift a little. The Bounce accord recedes, somewhat (it’s all relative), and the perfume manifest a strong honey note atop more individually distinct floral notes. Instead of amorphous, abstract, chemical florals, there is now a clear element of sweet honeysuckle mixed in with creamy magnolia. Lindn is still primarily a clean, fresh, white musk fragrance, though it is now, thankfully, a skin scent. Despite that sudden breakthrough, Linden eventually returns to being nothing more than a fresh, white, floral musk — abstract, chemical, and wholly artificial. It finally dies away 10.25 hours later. Words cannot express my utter disgust with the whole thing.
ARBORETUM:
Arboretum is an eau de parfum, and its notes are simple:
Green cardamom, ylang ylang, and amber resin.
Arboretum opens on my skin with green, floral notes infused by honey. There is a fresh, light, almost fruited cardamom that feels as though it is still a green pod on a tree, instead of dried and concentrated. The floral notes are interesting because, to my nose, they resemble white lilies — stargazer lilies, to be exact — more than anything close to ylang-ylang with its buttery, sometimes banana-like, custardy richness. The note is fresh, green, airy and crisp. Arboretum’s base is flecked by light dashes of sweet vanilla which feels quietly muted and somewhat synthetic, though nothing close to the horrifying degree of Linden. Twenty minutes in, Arboretum starts to gain some fresh, clean, white, synthetic musk accords in its base, but the primary bouquet is still of airy, green lilies. The sillage is decent at first, but quickly becomes much softer.
Arboretum doesn’t change enormously for the first half of its life. By the middle of the third hour, it is a soft, white, floral musk with a tinge of soapy lilies underlying it, and very much a skin scent. Around the start of the sixth hour, however, Arboretum suddenly takes on amber hues, and the ylang-ylang makes a strong appearance. The fragrance is now a buttery, custardy, soft, velvety, slightly banana-like, ylang-ylang floral atop soapy amber and light musk. Arboretum no longers feels so crisply airy and green, but, rather, warm and very much like a silky, golden gauze. The fragrance continues to soften until, finally, around the middle of the eighth hour, it is merely a soft, abstract floral note tinged by a vague sense of something ambered.
As a whole, Arboretum was a pleasant scent, though I don’t know how much of my assessment is relative to the sheer horror that was Linden. Arboretum certainly never felt close to the painfully synthetic, cheap, and artificial qualities of its sibling. I somewhat enjoyed the lily parts, and I thought the green cardamom aspect was quite interesting. If you’re looking for an inexpensive, greenishly airy, white floral fragrance that eventually becomes slightly richer, warmer and more ambered towards the end, I suppose you could do a lot worse. But, under no circumstances, would I recommend Linden. Save yourself $54, and just take a few dryer sheets to scrub up and down your arm instead.
‘Unmitigated hell’; ‘sheer horror’; ‘utter disgust’…….. I love your reactions! I would imagine that linden + honey would be a nightmare before we even smell the thing; if you then throw in narcissus (always dodgy) and then a big dose of synthetic we know we are going to be in trouble……hilarious.
I could have handled the linden and honey, and don’t have problems with narcissus, but the synthetic fabric softener was going too far! It went on, and on, and ON, getting worse with every minute. I spent much of the time just gritting my teeth, swearing, and thinking of all the other perfumes I’d rather be wearing. Complete misery for a solid 10 hours. 🙁
Your commitment is commendable. If I hate something it just HAS TO COME OFF
Do you think she will use this review on her website? ‘Read what Kafka had to say about Linden!’
Heh, I think she cares much more about Oprah…. 😉
!
I have never heard of this brand but I would happily try linden
But 98% of the perfume’s scent has nothing to do with Linden!
And that’s too bad.
So, two perfume houses aren’t enough? I can understand new lines or collections, but houses? Well, since I don’t like either Tokyo Milk or Lollia I didn’t plan to test this line (though Linden was calling my name when I read about it somewhere).
So, what was the last floral perfume that you liked? 🙂
Pure floral? Le Labo’s new Lys 41, without a doubt, then Tom Ford’s Jasmin Rouge. Those were the most recent ones that were pure florals.
I need to try Le Labo’s new ones!
So despite no Iso E Super, this triggered a primal NOOOOO scream from you! As a rule, I love linden in my perfume so I may put on my big girl shoes and try this if I encounter it somewhere.
I’ll be contrarian with scent twin Undina and say that I actually like the Tokyo Milk Dark line. I have 3 bottles: Tainted Love, Excess and Cake Batter (it’s called something else but I am too lazy to go look at the bottle right now).
Well, Linden isn’t the issue in this fragrance. It’s the total lack of Linden or anything else for that matter for 98.5% of the perfume’s lifespan — except for Bounce dryer sheets. Bounce, Bounce, synthetics, cotton synthetics and more Bounce. But perhaps you’ll have better luck. I doubt it, but let me know. 🙂
My dearest Kafka! I’m am so sorry! You are very brave for trying those on your skin. I see the bottles at Anthropologie all the time and avoid them because they look like pin cushions to me. Also, I think I’m no longer in the right age demographic for Lollia (too sweet), Tokyo Milk (too ‘tween), or this.
I can’t see you wearing this but then, frankly, I can’t see anyone here doing so either.
Pin cushions?? LOL! Lord knows, if I could have stuck a pin in “Linden” (the way you do to a voodoo doll), I would have. All I can say is that I’m NEVER ordering any more perfume samples when I’m that sleep deprived again. 😉 😛
So-called “linden” perfumes never smell like the real thing to me. Instead, they smell like detergent. Or toilet cleanser. Andy Tauer’s Zeta nearly frickin’ killllled me.
I really enjoyed this one ! I do enjoy a variety depending on season, outfit and occassion.
LOVE Arboretum!!! Tried it a few years ago in a Lake Placid boutique and I’ve been hooked on it ever since . The mixture of floral and amber is lovely – received many compliments on this fragrance .