What perfume does a bride chose to wear on her special day? It’s often a difficult decision because you want something that makes you feel really special. But when a bride is going to marry the future King of England before approximately 3 billion people, it may be an even harder decision. In Kate Middleton’s case, she chose White Gardenia Petals (henceforth “WGP“) by the British boutique house, Illuminum.
Illuminum is a relatively new perfume house launched in 2011. Its founder is Michael Boadi who also created the line’s sixteen perfumes, each of which falls into four main olfactory groups (citrus, floral, oud and musk). There are four perfumes within each of those four over-arching categories and, supposedly, none of the perfumes contains more than “eight carefully selected ingredients.” According to an interview he gave to Fragrantica, “[t]he Illuminum collection is for those days when you are in the mood for something exquisitely simple and stylish.” He answered some of Fragrantica’s questions about the scent and also explained his vision:
Creating a fragrance from merely eight ingredients was a real challenge, especially if we know that some fragrances include more than 500 ingredients. Finding the right eight ingredients that fit together perfectly, can even take a couple of years of careful planning. […]
Illuminum is the future of Fragrance due to its pared-down nature. If you are looking for minimalism at its purest, then look no further. If you want to smell ginger and pear, that is exactly what you will discover when you explore the Ginger Pear from Illuminum.
Kate Middleton’s decision to wear White Gardenia Petals on her wedding day was a huge coup for Illuminum. According to the Daily Mail, the perfume sold out within minutes of the news of her choice! To get a small idea of the scent (and the massive global obsession with the royal bride), yet another gushing Fragrantica article simpers:
White Gardenia Petals is a perfect choice that really suits the charming and feminine Kate, her beautiful wedding dress and her grace. The notes of this fragrance highlight the refined and very fresh breeze of gardenia, which is a guiding scent of the composition. Unpretentious gardenia is embellished in the heart with a fine trace of coconut, ylang-ylang, jasmine and lily of the valley, laid on the base of amber wood. The fragrance is available as 50 ml and 100 ml EDP.
Michael Boadi announces that White Gardenia Petals at the moment isn’t available anywhere in the world and that the waiting list for the purchase of this fragrance is three months!!!
The Illuminum website describes the perfume as follows:
White Gardenia Petals is as fragrant as a vase of white flowers, quivering in the breeze by an open window. This is a delicate and refined scent – the top note of lily evokes a summer ambiance, whilst heart notes of gardenia, ylang ylang, lily of the valley and jasmine breeze are sumptuous and feminine. Amber wood underscores this light bouquet.
Top notes: Bergamot, Cassis,
Heart: Jasmine, White Gardenia, Ylang Ylang,
Base notes: Precious Woods.
Fragrantica gives very different top notes — namely just coconut and nothing else — but it matters not one jot to the final impression which is: synthetic, floral, air freshener; soap; hair spray; and cheap shampoo. Given that Michael Boadi began as a hairdresser before making it big, I find it sadly coincidental that a man who left that world to create perfumes ended up making something that is a full-circle return to hair salons. And I’m far from alone in that sentiment. In fact, I’m being much kinder than some commentators. On the Fragrantica entry for White Gardenia Petals, one poster compared it to a “toilet cleaning product.”
I’m not sure I would go that far, but I found White Gardenia Petals to be utterly revolting. It’s not anywhere close to being as bad as Montale‘s Lime Aoud (honestly, I doubt anything ever will be) or the stomach-churning nausea induced by L’Artisan Parfumeur‘s Passage d’Enfer, but it was pretty godawful. As many of you know by now, the note that I abhor above all others is soapy and clean, particularly if the fragrance evokes laundry detergent or fabric softener and is expensive to boot. I simply cannot handle it. And, yet, a predominantly soapy scent may be (just barely) more tolerable than Illuminum’s WGP. (I shall have to ponder their relative ghastliness.)
The opening seconds of White Gardenia Petals on my skin was a sharp note of pure rubbing alcohol, only rendered floral. Then, there is an explosion of a thin, artificially airy — but simultaneously heady — shampoo note, with a heavy backdrop of Dove soap. The rubbing alcohol impression is tinged with a faint lemon note, making me wonder if we’re going from bathroom products to dish-washing liquid next. But no. It stays as a sharp burst of white flowers with shampoo and soap. I think Suave makes a white shampoo like this, and I know Dove’s soap is quite close for the soap notes here. The two things are separate “clean” scents in my mind, and they combine most unpleasantly with the very indolic, cheap gardenia and muguet (or lily-of-the-valley) notes. I think Bath & Body Works makes better versions of airy white florals which lack White Gardenia Petals’ strong similarity to hairspray. (It’s almost amusing to read the endless litany of “hair spray” comparisons in the comments on Lucky Scent.)
To be honest, it’s a bit hard to dissect some of the notes for the first hour because I’m overwhelmed by a screeeeeeeeeechingly loud, persistently plastic-y note that is often a dead give-away of something synthetic in a perfume. An even bigger give-away for me personally is the sensation I consistently get from very cheap additives: a feeling of tightness high up in the bridge of my nose, making me feel as though I have sinusitis, along with a faint burning sensation. I suddenly feel as though a headache is around the corner — and it’s been a while since a perfume made me feel that way.
The perfume continues its olfactory equivalent of assault and battery. I don’t smell ylang-ylang at this point, but I do get a strong impression of iris and/or violet. Perhaps my brain associates those notes with powdery fragrances, and White Gardenia Petals has got a definite powdery vibe. The powdery vibe is a bit different from the soap and shampoo/hairspray aspects. It stems more from the musk element which starts to make its presence known about 10 minutes in. It is cloying, and calls to mind Narcisco Rodriguez‘ For Her — only on steroids and amplified by a thousand. For Her is one of the few “clean” perfumes that I would wear if I had a gun pointed to my head, but there is something distinctly unpleasant about White Gardenia Petals’ twist on musky clean. Perhaps because it is all just one cacophonous mishmash of white florals, rubbing alcohol, indoles, powder, musk, synthetics, soap, shampoo, and cotton.
Oh, did I not mention cotton? Because I also get a very strong note of fresh, clean cotton. It sharply calls to mind the Clean line of perfumes (no, I’m not joking) and of their Cotton T-Shirt fragrance in particular. (How I wish I were making all that up.) It is at this point that I write in my notes, “please God, kill me now,” and I go to find some aspirin.
I would have felt like a character in Jean-Paul Sarte’s No Exit if it were not for one thing: this discordant cocktail lessens the volume of its assault, sooner rather than later. After an hour, the sillage is very low, such that I have to sniff my arm (sometimes forcefully) to assess how the fragrance is transforming, if at all. And it does. Many of the clashing notes fade away as White Gardenia Petals turns into simple gardenia scent with a faint undertone of creamy, custard-y, banana-like ylang-ylang. Alas, the soap still remains, as do the hinting wafts of cheap hairspray.
Though its sillage may have become demure, White Gardenia Petals’ persistence is a source of deep misery. Ten hours in, I can still smell some form of cheap, floral soap on my wrist. They say perfumers love synthetic additives because they multiply the longevity of a perfume (I think it may be because of the shape of the molecules), in addition to being a cheap shortcut. It must be true since all the synthetic soapy smells last on me for an extraordinary amount of time.
White Gardenia Petals is meant to be “a vase of white flowers, quivering in the breeze by an open window,” and clearly meant to suit someone like a bride who doesn’t want to be overshadowed by her fragrance. All that is fine and dandy. If people want to wear light florals with a fresh, clean note and demure sillage, all the more power to them. But I find it rather outrageous to charge £70.00 or $125 (on Lucky Scent) for a small 1.7 oz/50 ml bottle of revoltingly synthetic notes combined with florals that Bath & Body Works, The Body Shop, and some others can do as well — if not better. And that’s totally ignoring the fact that you can smell like Dove soap for about $1.25!
As one Fragrantica commentator noted, “Illuminum feature themselves in the media as a brand of the royals, like Creed does.” I’m happy for them. But if Kate Middleton had not chosen to wear this scent on the day she turned into the Duchess of Cambridge, I highly doubt that anyone would queue to spend the kind of money that Illuminum is charging to smell like cheap hairspray. If you want something light, fresh, airy, floral and bridal, try Issey Miyake‘s L’Eau d’Issey Miyake. Try anything, but I wouldn’t recommend this.
I concur wholeheartedly with your review! Could not scrub it off fast enough:)
Debbie!! You’re here! 🙂 I’ve thought of you a lot over the past few days. I want to sell this blasted thing on eBay and get it out of my house. 😉 LOL! I so wish I could have scrubbed it off, but I felt I had to give it the full go in order to write about it fairly. But, my God, what a horror! That opening hour was pure and utter torture. Every time I thought it couldn’t get worse, it DID!
The company sent me a complimentary bottle and I sent it back, that’s how bad it was!
I smelled only the bottle and right away it reminded me of NEET or NAIR depilatory cream !!!! Disgusting !!!!
Thanks for introducing some more information for this perfume. I’ve heard of it but never read about it. I’m not familiar with the brand too much, Wild Tobacco was the one I tried. Didn’t like it.
Was it too simple and “minimalistic” the way the chap said his perfumes were, or was it just plain hideous, linear and synthetic like this one? LOL.
Not sure if I remember well, probably was too straightforward and old-smelling.
PS. Got samples of HdP Veni, Vidi, Vici today
Have you seen these reviews? Olfactoria’s Travels and Bonkers about Perfume? If no, I think an investigator in you will love these extra details.
Oh, and one more thing: you shouldn’t abbreviate the perfume name in the article: since you’ve already spent time writing it, let search engines do their job – index and rank the article in accordance with its relevance to the subject.
That’s an excellent point. I have the appropriate tags, but I change a few of the abbreviations and spell out the name a little more. At the time, I was just so damn fed up with anything to do with it. 😉
I saw Olfactoria’s at the time I was preparing to write my review and Vanessa’s comments there as well. There was obviously some change (for the worse) between the initial scent and what is currently available. But since I’m writing in 2013 from a sample purchased in 2012 (I believe) and since their comments pertained to versions obtained early in 2011, I think it’s safe to say I’m writing about the current horrible one. Their rather horrified reactions in the updates to the later batch of scents, along with all the recent criticism of it as “hair spray” on places like Fragrantica or Lucky Scent, seems to confirm that. The version currently available to buyers is bloody awful. Words really can’t stress that enough. And, to be honest, I didn’t think Olfactoria’s initial review sounded particularly enchanting, special or remarkable, either. I think we have very different perfume styles, as I think she prefers much lighter, airier, sheerer scents with 24 Faubourg being a rare common liking. I like much bolder scents, whether much more spiced or things like Fracas and the Elixir. It’s just an impression, and I may be mistaken.
I was sure your review was for the current version. I just thought it was an interesting bit of information: how a company turned around and instead of using the popularity and sell the “better” version did something really strange.
As to Birgit’s perfume tastes, she’s in a phase now but, in general, she’s known tolove ambers – which aren’t too sheer.
It is very strange, but it saves the company money and Illuminum was opening up a big new store, so….. 😉 I have to say, I found there was quite a bit of ego in a number of things said by the founder about his line, as well as in how they seem to be positioning themselves media-wise. I am significantly more impressed by Andy Tauer. Kilian Hennessey, too, to some extent.
Ooh, just caught up with these later comments. Yes, I’d say that Birgit historically has a much greater capacity to appreciate heavier, richer scents than me – of the order of Nicolai Sacrebleu for example – where I tend to favour light wispy things, though I can go heavier on occasions. The metallic note was particularly disagreeable to me in the “correct” version of White Gardenia Petals.
Hi Vanessa, how lovely of you to stop by. 🙂 The whole thing about the “correct” version available to everyone and that one “mistaken” batch that was an anomaly (but which actually smelled okay) is pretty crazy to me. Personally, I’m still not convinced from the reviews about the mistaken/accidental version that it would really be my cup of tea, given reports of its wispy, sheer nature. But the “true” official version definitely wasn’t. LOL. I’m not surprised you sent your bottle back.
Meow!!! I love it 🙂
Mr. Hound, this was a much curtailed, much revised, much toned-down review for the scent. You should have seen my first draft….. 😉
I’ve been there before, I can only imagine!
Pingback: Perfume Review – Roberto Cavalli Eau de Parfum: My Guilty Pleasure | Kafkaesque